AMRABHAI JAGSHIBHAI PATEL (CHAUDHARY) vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA — 152/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK010005342026
Filing Number
152/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
152/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMRABHAI JAGSHIBHAI PATEL (CHAUDHARY)
Adv. N J SHRIMALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - D H CHAPIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA 152/2026 Court Decision: The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur granted Amrabhai Jagshibhai Patel's application to condone a 9-day delay in filing an appeal against a juvenile court order dated 02/01/2026. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the applicant was unaware of the judgment until later informed by his advocate, and allowed the delayed application to be registered accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Restored
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 152/2026
Case Summary: CRMA 152/2026 Court Decision: The 2nd Additional Sessions Court, Palanpur granted Amrabhai Jagshibhai Patel's application to condone a 9-day delay in filing an appeal against a juvenile court order dated 02/01/2026. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the applicant was unaware of the judgment until later informed by his advocate, and allowed the delayed application to be registered accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts