Government of Gujarat vs MAGANBHAI MOTIBHAI GALBABHAI PARMAR Advocate - D J DHARANI — 20/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,302. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK010004732019
Filing Number
20/2019
Filing Date
22-Feb-2019
Registration No
20/2019
Registration Date
22-Feb-2019
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
5-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
AMBAJI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. D H CHAPIYA, M.P.ZALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAGANBHAI MOTIBHAI GALBABHAI PARMAR Advocate - D J DHARANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary Court: Sessions Court, Palanpur, Gujarat Case Number: Sessions Case No. 20/2019 Date of Judgment: 27-03-2026 Decision The court acquitted the accused Maganbhai Motibhai Parmar of charges under IPC Sections 307 and 302 (attempt to cause death and murder). The accused was given the benefit of reasonable doubt and discharged from the charges. Key Reasoning The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the victim's (Punabhai) death. While the medical evidence confirmed the victim died from severe head injuries caused by blunt objects (stone and wooden stake), the prosecution could not conclusively establish the accused's involvement. The victim's family members gave contradictory statements, and no direct eyewitness testimony placed the accused at the crime scene committing the act. The court noted significant gaps in the prosecution's case and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-May-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jul-2024
Final Arguments
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jun-2024
Further Statement
5th Addl District Judge
-
30-May-2024
Further Statement
5th Addl District Judge
-
01-May-2024
Further Statement
7th Addl District Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Further Statement
7th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
7th Addl District Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
7th Addl District Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
7th Addl District Judge
-
25-May-2023
Process To Accused
7th Addl District Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Oct-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Jun-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Apr-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Mar-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jan-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
06-Dec-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
09-Nov-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Oct-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Sep-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Aug-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jul-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jun-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-May-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
15-Feb-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jan-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jul-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Jun-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jun-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Feb-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
19-Oct-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Sep-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Sep-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Aug-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2019
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Jun-2019
Process To Accused
4th Addl District Judge
-
04-May-2019
Process To Accused
5th Addl District Judge
-
20-Apr-2019
Process To Accused
5th Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2019
Process To Accused
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2019
Case Summary Court: Sessions Court, Palanpur, Gujarat Case Number: Sessions Case No. 20/2019 Date of Judgment: 27-03-2026 Decision The court acquitted the accused Maganbhai Motibhai Parmar of charges under IPC Sections 307 and 302 (attempt to cause death and murder). The accused was given the benefit of reasonable doubt and discharged from the charges. Key Reasoning The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was responsible for the victim's (Punabhai) death. While the medical evidence confirmed the victim died from severe head injuries caused by blunt objects (stone and wooden stake), the prosecution could not conclusively establish the accused's involvement. The victim's family members gave contradictory statements, and no direct eyewitness testimony placed the accused at the crime scene committing the act. The court noted significant gaps in the prosecution's case and inconsistencies in witness testimonies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts