PRATAPJI AMTHAJI DAYANI vs IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI — 11/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJBK010001482026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRATAPJI AMTHAJI DAYANI
Adv. A D MODASIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI
-
2.RAJAKBHAI N. AAGLODIYA
Adv. S M SWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 11/2026 The court dismissed the petitioner Pratapji Amthaji Dayani's application for default (D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple adjournments on 12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026. The petitioner failed to provide necessary documentation including property schedules, inventory lists, and attachment warrants required to proceed with execution of the decree against respondent Ibrahimkhan Nurkhan Baloch. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application in future after obtaining proper inventory and schedules of the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
Case Summary: 11/2026 The court dismissed the petitioner Pratapji Amthaji Dayani's application for default (D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple adjournments on 12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026. The petitioner failed to provide necessary documentation including property schedules, inventory lists, and attachment warrants required to proceed with execution of the decree against respondent Ibrahimkhan Nurkhan Baloch. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application in future after obtaining proper inventory and schedules of the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts