GAJRIBEN W/O VADABHAI TARAL vs IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: GJBK010001462026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJRIBEN W/O VADABHAI TARAL

    Adv. A D MODASIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI

  2. 2.RAJAKBHAI N. AAGLODIYA

    Adv. S M SWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 9/2026 The court dismissed the petitioner Gajriben's application for default (D.D.) due to her consistent non-appearance despite notices on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026). The application was a decree execution petition lacking proper documentation—no inventory, schedule, or seizure warrant was submitted, and no further proceedings could be undertaken without the petitioner's participation. The court permitted the petitioner to refile a fresh application in future after obtaining the respondent's property inventory and schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 9/2026 The court dismissed the petitioner Gajriben's application for default (D.D.) due to her consistent non-appearance despite notices on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026). The application was a decree execution petition lacking proper documentation—no inventory, schedule, or seizure warrant was submitted, and no further proceedings could be undertaken without the petitioner's participation. The court permitted the petitioner to refile a fresh application in future after obtaining the respondent's property inventory and schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case