VAILAJI TEJAJI DAYANI vs IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI — 8/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: GJBK010001452026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAILAJI TEJAJI DAYANI

    Adv. A D MODASIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI

  2. 2.RAJAKBHAI N. AAGLODIYA

    Adv. S M SWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petitioner Vailaji Tejaji Dayani's application for default (dismissed for default/D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite notices issued on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, 20/03/2026). The court noted the petitioner failed to provide necessary documents including property inventory, schedule, or seizure warrant details required to proceed with execution of the decree against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Objections

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petitioner Vailaji Tejaji Dayani's application for default (dismissed for default/D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite notices issued on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, 20/03/2026). The court noted the petitioner failed to provide necessary documents including property inventory, schedule, or seizure warrant details required to proceed with execution of the decree against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case