HIRAJI MANGAJI DAYANI vs IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJBK010001432026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HIRAJI MANGAJI DAYANI
Adv. A D MODASIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI
-
2.RAJAKBHAI N. AAGLODIYA
Adv. S M SWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioner Hiraji Mangaji Dayani's application for default (D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple adjournments on 12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026. The petitioner failed to provide necessary documents including property inventory and schedule of the respondent's assets required for execution proceedings. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application in future after obtaining proper inventory and schedule from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
The court dismissed the petitioner Hiraji Mangaji Dayani's application for default (D.D.) due to repeated non-appearance despite multiple adjournments on 12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026. The petitioner failed to provide necessary documents including property inventory and schedule of the respondent's assets required for execution proceedings. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application in future after obtaining proper inventory and schedule from the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts