DHULAJI MALAJI VAGHELA vs IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI — 5/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R39. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJBK010001422026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT PALANPUR
Judge
6-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHULAJI MALAJI VAGHELA
Adv. A D MODASIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.IBRAHIMKHAN NURKHAN BALOCH Advocate - S M SWAMI
-
2.RAJAKBHAI N. AAGLODIYA
Adv. S M SWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner Dhulaji Malaji Vaghela's application for default (Dismissed for Default - D.D.) due to non-appearance despite notice on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026). The application, which was a decree execution petition seeking recovery from the respondent, lacked necessary documentation including property schedule, inventory, and seizure warrant details. The petitioner is permitted to file a fresh application in the future after obtaining the requisite inventory and schedule of the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing On Objections
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
Case Summary: The court dismissed the petitioner Dhulaji Malaji Vaghela's application for default (Dismissed for Default - D.D.) due to non-appearance despite notice on multiple dates (12/03/2026, 17/03/2026, and 20/03/2026). The application, which was a decree execution petition seeking recovery from the respondent, lacked necessary documentation including property schedule, inventory, and seizure warrant details. The petitioner is permitted to file a fresh application in the future after obtaining the requisite inventory and schedule of the respondent's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts