PRAJAPATI SURESHBHAI DHARAMSINGH BHANABHAI vs PRAJAPATI BHUPATSINGH DHARAMSINGH Advocate - A H PANDYA — 17/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH130010112017

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

17/2017

Filing Date

05-02-2010

Registration No

17/2017

Registration Date

05-02-2010

Court

TALUKA COURT, NETRANG

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 034,038
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9,151

Petitioner(s)

PRAJAPATI SURESHBHAI DHARAMSINGH BHANABHAI

Adv. H.K.VAROTARIYA

Respondent(s)

PRAJAPATI BHUPATSINGH DHARAMSINGH Advocate - A H PANDYA

GODAVARI DHARAMSINGH BHANA

Adv. A H PANDYA

PRAJAPATI JAGUBHAI DHARAMSINGH

Adv. A H PANDYA

PRAJAPATI JAYNTIBHAI DHARAMSINGH

PRAJAPATI GORADHAN DHARAMSINGH

Adv. A H PANDYA

MADHUBEN DHARAMSINGH PRAJAPATI

DHARMISTABEN DHARAMSINGH

LATABEN GIVINDBHAI BHANA

KAMLESHBHAI GOVIND PRAJAPATI

SAGITABEN GOVINDBHAI BHANA

NITABEN GOVINDBHAI PRAJAPATI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-02-2026

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

22-01-2026
ORDER
12-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: RCS/17/2017 Outcome: Application for joinder of third parties rejected; case posted for final arguments. In this ancestral property partition suit, the court rejected an application to add three new parties (legal heirs of deceased Balubhai Prajapati) as defendants. The court found multiple procedural defects: incomplete power of attorney, lack of personal knowledge by the attorney-in-fact, hearsay evidence, and the applicants' inability to identify basic property details. The court noted the plaintiffs' own failure to raise these parties initially (2010) suggests they weren't aware of claimed relationships, and no marriage registration certificate was produced to support marital claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS/17/2017 Outcome: Application for joinder of third parties rejected; case posted for final arguments. In this ancestral property partition suit, the court rejected an application to add three new parties (legal heirs of deceased Balubhai Prajapati) as defendants. The court found multiple procedural defects: incomplete power of attorney, lack of personal knowledge by the attorney-in-fact, hearsay evidence, and the applicants' inability to identify basic property details. The court noted the plaintiffs' own failure to raise these parties initially (2010) suggests they weren't aware of claimed relationships, and no marriage registration certificate was produced to support marital claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NETRANG All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case