GOV. OF GUJARAT vs SURAJBEN RAMANBHAI AMRSINGBHAI VASAVA — 306/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH130003172026

Filing Number

306/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

306/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, NETRANG

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199005250919

Police Station

NETRANG POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOV. OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURAJBEN RAMANBHAI AMRSINGBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The accused, Surajben Ramanbhai Amrsingbhai Vasava, pleaded guilty to charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A) before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Netrang. The court accepted the voluntary confession and, considering it the accused's first offense with an assurance against repetition, sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 306/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The accused, Surajben Ramanbhai Amrsingbhai Vasava, pleaded guilty to charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A) before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Netrang. The court accepted the voluntary confession and, considering it the accused's first offense with an assurance against repetition, sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹100 with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case