ASHWINBHAI JEKISHANDAS PANCHAL vs JAYNTILAL AMBALAL DOSHI Advocate - S N PATEL — 4/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH130000402026
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
4/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
22-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, NETRANG
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHWINBHAI JEKISHANDAS PANCHAL
Adv. A H PANDYA
Respondent(s)
JAYNTILAL AMBALAL DOSHI Advocate - S N PATEL
PIYUSHBHAI JAYNTILAL DOSHI
Adv. S N PATEL
SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATANVADIA
Adv. S N PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
ISSUES
ISSUES
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | ISSUES |
| 09-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Netrang, Bharuch Date: 9th April 2026 Outcome: Interlocutory injunction application partially allowed. Plaintiff Ashwinbhai Jekishandas Panchal sought to restrain neighbors from obstructing his property rights. The court found that defendants illegally permitted defendant 3 to operate a tea stall (laari) on plaintiff's entrance space, violating easementary rights. The court ordered defendants to remove the unauthorized laari stall within one week, failing which police intervention would follow. No costs awarded; trial proceedings unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Netrang, Bharuch Date: 9th April 2026 Outcome: Interlocutory injunction application partially allowed. Plaintiff Ashwinbhai Jekishandas Panchal sought to restrain neighbors from obstructing his property rights. The court found that defendants illegally permitted defendant 3 to operate a tea stall (laari) on plaintiff's entrance space, violating easementary rights. The court ordered defendants to remove the unauthorized laari stall within one week, failing which police intervention would follow. No costs awarded; trial proceedings unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts