ASHWINBHAI JEKISHANDAS PANCHAL vs JAYNTILAL AMBALAL DOSHI Advocate - S N PATEL — 4/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH130000402026

ISSUES

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, NETRANG

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

ASHWINBHAI JEKISHANDAS PANCHAL

Adv. A H PANDYA

Respondent(s)

JAYNTILAL AMBALAL DOSHI Advocate - S N PATEL

PIYUSHBHAI JAYNTILAL DOSHI

Adv. S N PATEL

SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI PATANVADIA

Adv. S N PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-05-2026

ISSUES

09-04-2026

ISSUES

25-03-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

12-03-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

26-02-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Civil Suit 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Netrang, Bharuch Date: 9th April 2026 Outcome: Interlocutory injunction application partially allowed. Plaintiff Ashwinbhai Jekishandas Panchal sought to restrain neighbors from obstructing his property rights. The court found that defendants illegally permitted defendant 3 to operate a tea stall (laari) on plaintiff's entrance space, violating easementary rights. The court ordered defendants to remove the unauthorized laari stall within one week, failing which police intervention would follow. No costs awarded; trial proceedings unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Suit 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Netrang, Bharuch Date: 9th April 2026 Outcome: Interlocutory injunction application partially allowed. Plaintiff Ashwinbhai Jekishandas Panchal sought to restrain neighbors from obstructing his property rights. The court found that defendants illegally permitted defendant 3 to operate a tea stall (laari) on plaintiff's entrance space, violating easementary rights. The court ordered defendants to remove the unauthorized laari stall within one week, failing which police intervention would follow. No costs awarded; trial proceedings unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, NETRANG All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case