D B GAMIT vs SUDHANSHU PATNAYAK — 790/2025

Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 68. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH100011702025

Filing Number

790/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

790/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Factories Act, 1948 Section 68

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D B GAMIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHANSHU PATNAYAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 790/2025 - D B GAMIT v. SUDHANSHU PATNAYAK The Labour Court, Bharuch convicted factory manager Sudhanshu Patnayak for violating Rule 68-U(C) of the Gujarat Factory Rules, 1963. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges in the first instance, and the court accepted his plea. Considering the nature and gravity of the offense, the accused's socio-economic status, and prior history, the court sentenced Patnayak to pay a fine of ₹10,000 for each rule violation. In default of payment, he faces simple imprisonment for 10 days per violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 790/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 790/2025 - D B GAMIT v. SUDHANSHU PATNAYAK The Labour Court, Bharuch convicted factory manager Sudhanshu Patnayak for violating Rule 68-U(C) of the Gujarat Factory Rules, 1963. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges in the first instance, and the court accepted his plea. Considering the nature and gravity of the offense, the accused's socio-economic status, and prior history, the court sentenced Patnayak to pay a fine of ₹10,000 for each rule violation. In default of payment, he faces simple imprisonment for 10 days per violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case