M.K.MEVALIA vs SATYAM INDUSTRIES Advocate - M I SHAIKH — 756/2025
Case under The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH100011262025
Filing Number
756/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
756/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.K.MEVALIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATYAM INDUSTRIES Advocate - M I SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Labour Court found Satyam Industries and its partners guilty of violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Rules 26(D), 26(2), and 26(B)(1)) and sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹18,000 (₹2,000 × 3 × 3 for each violation) or face 10 days simple imprisonment in default. The court imposed only monetary punishment rather than imprisonment, considering the nature and severity of the violations and the accused's socio-economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jan-2026
Plea
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 756/2025
The Labour Court found Satyam Industries and its partners guilty of violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Rules 26(D), 26(2), and 26(B)(1)) and sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹18,000 (₹2,000 × 3 × 3 for each violation) or face 10 days simple imprisonment in default. The court imposed only monetary punishment rather than imprisonment, considering the nature and severity of the violations and the accused's socio-economic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts