DENO PHARMA CHEMICALS PVT LTD vs RATHVA SALUBHAI RATANBHAI Advocate - D.S.JOG — 8/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 26A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

MISC26A LC - Misc. Application - Under Rule-26A

CNR: GJBH100009702025

Filing Number

8/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

29-Sep-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 26A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DENO PHARMA CHEMICALS PVT LTD

    Adv. A V KHAMBHATA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHVA SALUBHAI RATANBHAI Advocate - D.S.JOG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: Case 8/2025 - DENO PHARMA CHEMICALS PVT LTD vs RATHVA SALUBHAI RATANBHAI The Labour Court partially set aside a one-sided award (Reference Case 23/2024) that had been passed in the employer's absence, finding the termination of the worker unlawful and violating natural justice principles. The court ordered the employer to reinstate the worker to their original position within 30 days with 30% back wages from the termination date, pay reference costs of Rs. 5,000, and remanded the main case for adjudication on merits, giving the employer opportunity to present their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 8/2025 - DENO PHARMA CHEMICALS PVT LTD vs RATHVA SALUBHAI RATANBHAI The Labour Court partially set aside a one-sided award (Reference Case 23/2024) that had been passed in the employer's absence, finding the termination of the worker unlawful and violating natural justice principles. The court ordered the employer to reinstate the worker to their original position within 30 days with 30% back wages from the termination date, pay reference costs of Rs. 5,000, and remanded the main case for adjudication on merits, giving the employer opportunity to present their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case