R.M.CHAUDHARY vs HUNGRY EYES MULTICUSINE RESTORANT — 664/2025

Case under Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 17. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH100009652025

Filing Number

664/2025

Filing Date

24-Sep-2025

Registration No

664/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 17

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.M.CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HUNGRY EYES MULTICUSINE RESTORANT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Labour Court found the accused (Akshaykumar Harshkantbhai and Hungry Eyes Multicuisine Restaurant) guilty of violating Rule 17 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹2,000 per violation × 2 violations) or face 10 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 664/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Labour Court found the accused (Akshaykumar Harshkantbhai and Hungry Eyes Multicuisine Restaurant) guilty of violating Rule 17 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of ₹4,000 (₹2,000 per violation × 2 violations) or face 10 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case