TECHNOFORGE LTD. vs SATYAVAAN KUSHVAHA Advocate - D.S.JOG — 7/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 26A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

MISC26A LC - Misc. Application - Under Rule-26A

CNR: GJBH100007812025

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

28-Jul-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 26A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TECHNOFORGE LTD.

    Adv. N R VASAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYAVAAN KUSHVAHA Advocate - D.S.JOG

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Labour Court in Bharuch condoned a 167-day delay in filing an application under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding that the delay was not intentional but resulted from TechnoForge Ltd.'s liquidation proceedings. The court partially allowed the company's application, directing it to pay ₹5,000 as costs to the respondent Satyavaan Kushvaha, while setting aside an ex-parte recovery order and remitting the original case for fresh hearing to ensure both parties receive adequate opportunity to present their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Labour Court in Bharuch condoned a 167-day delay in filing an application under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding that the delay was not intentional but resulted from TechnoForge Ltd.'s liquidation proceedings. The court partially allowed the company's application, directing it to pay ₹5,000 as costs to the respondent Satyavaan Kushvaha, while setting aside an ex-parte recovery order and remitting the original case for fresh hearing to ensure both parties receive adequate opportunity to present their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case