UTTAMBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 128/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004612022

Filing Number

128/2022

Filing Date

22-Jun-2022

Registration No

128/2022

Registration Date

22-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTTAMBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. D.S.JOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTEDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 12-May-2023

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 128/2022 Labour Court No. 2, Bharuch Parties: - Petitioner: Uttambhai Parsottambhai Solanki - Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court ordered that Respondent No. 1 (Primary Healthcare Centre) reinstate the petitioner to his original position with back wages at 25% higher than normal salary within 30 days. A reference case fee of Rs. 2,000 was imposed on Respondent No. 1, and the case concerning Respondent No. 2 (Hospital) was dismissed. The court found the petitioner was working 240+ days annually as a contractual employee and was illegally terminated without due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 12-May-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 06-May-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 02-May-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 29-Apr-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 17-Apr-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 08-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 24-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 17-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 09-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 19-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 29-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 28-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 10-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 07-Oct-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 26-Sep-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 08-Sep-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 22-Aug-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 22-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 128/2022 Labour Court No. 2, Bharuch Parties: - Petitioner: Uttambhai Parsottambhai Solanki - Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court ordered that Respondent No. 1 (Primary Healthcare Centre) reinstate the petitioner to his original position with back wages at 25% higher than normal salary within 30 days. A reference case fee of Rs. 2,000 was imposed on Respondent No. 1, and the case concerning Respondent No. 2 (Hospital) was dismissed. The court found the petitioner was working 240+ days annually as a contractual employee and was illegally terminated without due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case