KALPNABEN AJAYBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 121/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100004542022
Filing Number
121/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
121/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALPNABEN AJAYBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D.S.JOG
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH
-
2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-May-2023
Judegement
Case 121/2022 Summary Petitioner: Kalpnaben Ajaybhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The Labour Court partially allowed the petition. The petitioner, who was terminated on 31-03-2022 without notice or opportunity to be heard, was awarded reinstatement with 25% back wages covering the notice period. Respondent No. 1 (hospital) was ordered to reinstate her; Respondent No. 2 received no adverse order. The court found the termination violated procedural fairness under the Industrial Disputes Act and awarded Rs. 2,000 in case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2023
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-May-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-May-2023
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Apr-2023
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Nov-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Oct-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Aug-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 121/2022
Case 121/2022 Summary Petitioner: Kalpnaben Ajaybhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The Labour Court partially allowed the petition. The petitioner, who was terminated on 31-03-2022 without notice or opportunity to be heard, was awarded reinstatement with 25% back wages covering the notice period. Respondent No. 1 (hospital) was ordered to reinstate her; Respondent No. 2 received no adverse order. The court found the termination violated procedural fairness under the Industrial Disputes Act and awarded Rs. 2,000 in case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts