REKHABEN MOHANBHAI MAHIDA vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 120/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004532022

Filing Number

120/2022

Filing Date

22-Jun-2022

Registration No

120/2022

Registration Date

22-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REKHABEN MOHANBHAI MAHIDA

    Adv. NIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 12-May-2023

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Rekhaben Mohanbhai Mahida v. D.G. Nakrani & Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Case No.: 120/2022 | Court: Labour Court No. 2, Bharuch Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court reinstated the petitioner to her original position with back wages at 25% higher rate from the date of termination (31-01-2022) within 30 days; directed Rs. 2,000 as case costs to the respondent; and denied relief to the second respondent (hospital superintendent). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 12-May-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 06-May-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 02-May-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 29-Apr-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 17-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 08-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 24-Mar-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 17-Mar-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 02-Mar-2023

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 23-Feb-2023

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 09-Feb-2023

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 19-Jan-2023

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 29-Dec-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 28-Nov-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 10-Nov-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 07-Oct-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 26-Sep-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 08-Sep-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 22-Aug-2022

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 22-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rekhaben Mohanbhai Mahida v. D.G. Nakrani & Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Case No.: 120/2022 | Court: Labour Court No. 2, Bharuch Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court reinstated the petitioner to her original position with back wages at 25% higher rate from the date of termination (31-01-2022) within 30 days; directed Rs. 2,000 as case costs to the respondent; and denied relief to the second respondent (hospital superintendent). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case