MINAXIBEN ARVINDBHAI VAGHELA vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 119/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100004522022
Filing Number
119/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
119/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MINAXIBEN ARVINDBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. NIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH
-
2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Apr-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-May-2023
Judegement
SUMMARY: Labour Court No-2, Bharuch partially allowed the reference (LCB) No-119/2022 filed by Minaxiben Arvindbhai Vaghela against D.G. Nakrani and the Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital. The court found that the respondent wrongfully terminated the petitioner's employment on 31-01-2022 without proper notice or opportunity to be heard, violating Industrial Disputes Act provisions. The court ordered reinstatement of the petitioner to her original position with 25% back wages for the period of unemployment, along with Rs. 2,000 towards case costs and other ancillary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2023
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-May-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-May-2023
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Apr-2023
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Feb-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Feb-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Dec-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Oct-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Sep-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Sep-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Aug-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2022
SUMMARY: Labour Court No-2, Bharuch partially allowed the reference (LCB) No-119/2022 filed by Minaxiben Arvindbhai Vaghela against D.G. Nakrani and the Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital. The court found that the respondent wrongfully terminated the petitioner's employment on 31-01-2022 without proper notice or opportunity to be heard, violating Industrial Disputes Act provisions. The court ordered reinstatement of the petitioner to her original position with 25% back wages for the period of unemployment, along with Rs. 2,000 towards case costs and other ancillary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts