RAMILABEN HEMANTBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 116/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004492022

Filing Number

116/2022

Filing Date

22-Jun-2022

Registration No

116/2022

Registration Date

22-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMILABEN HEMANTBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. D.S.JOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 12-May-2023

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 116/2022 - Labour Court No-2, Bharuch Petitioner: Ramilaben Hemantbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to her original position with full back wages, arrears, and benefits from the date of her wrongful termination (01-04-2022). The court found that the petitioner worked as a contractual employee for over 240 days annually, establishing an employer-employee relationship, and her dismissal violated procedural fairness and labour law provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 12-May-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 06-May-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 02-May-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 29-Apr-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 17-Apr-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 08-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 24-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 17-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 09-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 19-Jan-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 29-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 15-Dec-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 28-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 10-Nov-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 07-Oct-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 26-Sep-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 08-Sep-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 22-Aug-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 22-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 116/2022 - Labour Court No-2, Bharuch Petitioner: Ramilaben Hemantbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent, Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to her original position with full back wages, arrears, and benefits from the date of her wrongful termination (01-04-2022). The court found that the petitioner worked as a contractual employee for over 240 days annually, establishing an employer-employee relationship, and her dismissal violated procedural fairness and labour law provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case