HEMABEN VASANTBHAI PATEL vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 114/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100004472022
Filing Number
114/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
114/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEMABEN VASANTBHAI PATEL
Adv. D.S.JOG
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH
-
2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-May-2023
Judegement
Case Summary: 114/2022 Labour Court No-2, Bharuch Petitioner: Hemaben Vasantbhai Patel Respondents: D.G. Nakrani (Bharuch General Hospital) and Medical Superintendent The Labour Court partially allowed the petition. The court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to her original position with 25% back wages for the period from dismissal (01-04-2022) until reinstatement, plus all accrued benefits. The court found the dismissal procedurally defective as it violated due process requirements. Respondent No-1 (hospital) was ordered to pay Rs. 2,000 as reference case costs. The court rejected claims regarding permanent employment status and some ancillary reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2023
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-May-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-May-2023
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Apr-2023
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Nov-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Oct-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Aug-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2022
Case Summary: 114/2022 Labour Court No-2, Bharuch Petitioner: Hemaben Vasantbhai Patel Respondents: D.G. Nakrani (Bharuch General Hospital) and Medical Superintendent The Labour Court partially allowed the petition. The court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to her original position with 25% back wages for the period from dismissal (01-04-2022) until reinstatement, plus all accrued benefits. The court found the dismissal procedurally defective as it violated due process requirements. Respondent No-1 (hospital) was ordered to pay Rs. 2,000 as reference case costs. The court rejected claims regarding permanent employment status and some ancillary reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts