BHAVIKKUMAR ASHWINBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 112/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100004452022
Filing Number
112/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
112/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAVIKKUMAR ASHWINBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D.S.JOG
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH
-
2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Apr-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-May-2023
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 112/2022 Case: Labour Court No-2, Bharuch, Reference (LCB) No-112/2022 Petitioner: Bhavikkumar Ashwinbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital The Labour Court partially allowed the reference. The court ruled that the petitioner was employed by the hospital on an O.T. servant basis from May 18, 2021, earning Rs. 8,900/month, and had completed 240 days of continuous service. The court found the petitioner's termination on April 1, 2022, violated Industrial Dispute Act provisions and ordered reinstatement with 25% back wages from termination date plus court costs of Rs. 2,000, with the hospital directed to reinstate within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2023
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-May-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-May-2023
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Apr-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Apr-2023
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
23-Feb-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Feb-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Jan-2023
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Dec-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Dec-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
28-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Oct-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Sep-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Sep-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Aug-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2022
Summary of Case 112/2022 Case: Labour Court No-2, Bharuch, Reference (LCB) No-112/2022 Petitioner: Bhavikkumar Ashwinbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital The Labour Court partially allowed the reference. The court ruled that the petitioner was employed by the hospital on an O.T. servant basis from May 18, 2021, earning Rs. 8,900/month, and had completed 240 days of continuous service. The court found the petitioner's termination on April 1, 2022, violated Industrial Dispute Act provisions and ordered reinstatement with 25% back wages from termination date plus court costs of Rs. 2,000, with the hospital directed to reinstate within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts