SANGITA MUKESHBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 108/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004412022

Filing Number

108/2022

Filing Date

22-Jun-2022

Registration No

108/2022

Registration Date

22-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGITA MUKESHBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. D.S.JOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 28-Jun-2023

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Sangita Mukeshbhai Solanki v. D.G. Nakrani & Others (Case 108/2022) Outcome: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED. The Labour Court found that petitioner Sangita Mukeshbhai Solanki was illegally terminated and ordered her reinstatement to her original position with full back wages at 40% of lost salary from termination date, plus costs of Rs. 10,000 to be paid by Respondent No. 1 (Bharuch General Hospital). However, Respondent No. 2 (Medical Superintendent) was not held liable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 28-Jun-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 26-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 23-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 21-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 12-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 05-Jun-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 26-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 19-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 17-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 05-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 01-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 26-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 11-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 03-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 24-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 17-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 03-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 27-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 13-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 29-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 15-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 28-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 10-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 13-Oct-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 08-Sep-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 22-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 22-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sangita Mukeshbhai Solanki v. D.G. Nakrani & Others (Case 108/2022) Outcome: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED. The Labour Court found that petitioner Sangita Mukeshbhai Solanki was illegally terminated and ordered her reinstatement to her original position with full back wages at 40% of lost salary from termination date, plus costs of Rs. 10,000 to be paid by Respondent No. 1 (Bharuch General Hospital). However, Respondent No. 2 (Medical Superintendent) was not held liable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case