SHANUBHAI GORDHANBHAI SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 104/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100004372022
Filing Number
104/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
104/2022
Registration Date
22-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANUBHAI GORDHANBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. D.S.JOG
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH
-
2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF BHARUCH GENERAL HOSPITAL BHARUCH
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jun-2023
Judegement
Case Summary Case: 104/2022, Labour Court No-1, Bharuch Petitioner: Shanubhai Gordhanbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani & Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The court PARTIALLY ALLOWED the petition. The petitioner was ordered reinstated to his original position with 40% of back wages for the period of termination, to be implemented within 30 days. The court also imposed Rs. 3,000 costs against the primary respondent and rejected the claim against the secondary respondent (hospital management). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jun-2023
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Jun-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jun-2023
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jun-2023
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jun-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jun-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-May-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-May-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-May-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-May-2023
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-May-2023
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Dec-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Dec-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Nov-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Nov-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Sep-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2022
Case Summary Case: 104/2022, Labour Court No-1, Bharuch Petitioner: Shanubhai Gordhanbhai Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani & Medical Superintendent of Bharuch General Hospital Outcome: The court PARTIALLY ALLOWED the petition. The petitioner was ordered reinstated to his original position with 40% of back wages for the period of termination, to be implemented within 30 days. The court also imposed Rs. 3,000 costs against the primary respondent and rejected the claim against the secondary respondent (hospital management). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts