NAYNABEN BHAGVANBHAI CHAUHAN vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 96/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004292022

Filing Number

96/2022

Filing Date

21-Jun-2022

Registration No

96/2022

Registration Date

21-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAYNABEN BHAGVANBHAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. D.S.JOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF GENERAL HOSPITAL

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 28-Jun-2023

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 96/2022 - Naynaben Bhagvanbhai Chauhan v. D.G. Nakrani & Others Outcome: The Labour Court partially allowed the reference on Industrial Dispute merits. The petitioner (worker) was found to be an employee of the Primary Respondent No. 1 (contractor) and entitled to reinstatement to her original position with back wages (40% of lost days' wages from the date of illegal termination) plus Rs. 3,000 in reference costs. The court rejected claims against Primary Respondent No. 2 (principal employer) regarding direct employment but held that improper termination violated labour law provisions requiring proper notice and compliance with dismissal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 28-Jun-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 26-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 23-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 21-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 12-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 05-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 26-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 19-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 17-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 05-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 01-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 26-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 11-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 03-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 24-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 17-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 03-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 27-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 13-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 29-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 15-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 28-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 10-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 13-Oct-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 08-Sep-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 22-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 21-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 96/2022 - Naynaben Bhagvanbhai Chauhan v. D.G. Nakrani & Others Outcome: The Labour Court partially allowed the reference on Industrial Dispute merits. The petitioner (worker) was found to be an employee of the Primary Respondent No. 1 (contractor) and entitled to reinstatement to her original position with back wages (40% of lost days' wages from the date of illegal termination) plus Rs. 3,000 in reference costs. The court rejected claims against Primary Respondent No. 2 (principal employer) regarding direct employment but held that improper termination violated labour law provisions requiring proper notice and compliance with dismissal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case