VIPUL KALIDAS SOLANKI vs D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH — 95/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Reply of opponent. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

For Reply of opponent Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJBH100004282022

Filing Number

95/2022

Filing Date

21-Jun-2022

Registration No

95/2022

Registration Date

21-Jun-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPUL KALIDAS SOLANKI

    Adv. D.S.JOG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.G.NAKRANI AND OTHER Advocate - M R PARIKH

  2. 2.MEDICAL SUPRINTENDENT OF GENERAL HOSPITAL

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-May-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 16-Jun-2025

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 23-Apr-2025

    Restored

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 21-Jul-2023

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 95/2022 Petitioner: Vipul Kalidas Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent of General Hospital Court: Labour Court No-1, Bharuch Outcome The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court directed that Vipul Kalidas Solanki be reinstated to his original position with 40% back wages for the period of unemployment, plus 30 days' notice period wages. Primary Petitioner No. 1 was ordered to pay reference costs of Rs. 3,000. The illegality of the dismissal under industrial law was declared, and respondents were barred from filing counter-suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 21-Jul-2023

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 07-Jul-2023

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 28-Jun-2023

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 26-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 23-Jun-2023

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 21-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 12-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 05-Jun-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 26-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 19-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 17-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 05-May-2023

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 01-May-2023

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 26-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 11-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 03-Apr-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 24-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 17-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 02-Mar-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 23-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 03-Feb-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 27-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 13-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 29-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 15-Dec-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 28-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 10-Nov-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 13-Oct-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 08-Sep-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 22-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 18-Aug-2022

    For Notice Serve to opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 21-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 95/2022 Petitioner: Vipul Kalidas Solanki Respondents: D.G. Nakrani and Medical Superintendent of General Hospital Court: Labour Court No-1, Bharuch Outcome The petition is partially allowed. The Labour Court directed that Vipul Kalidas Solanki be reinstated to his original position with 40% back wages for the period of unemployment, plus 30 days' notice period wages. Primary Petitioner No. 1 was ordered to pay reference costs of Rs. 3,000. The illegality of the dismissal under industrial law was declared, and respondents were barred from filing counter-suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case