M K MEVALIYA vs FIROZ ABDUL PATEL — 33/2026

Case under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH100001442026

Filing Number

33/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M K MEVALIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FIROZ ABDUL PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 33/2026 The Labour Court of Bharuch convicted Firoz Abdul Patel, owner of Kabir Petroleum, for violating Section 27(4) of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court, considering the nature of the offense, the defendant's socio-economic status, and prior precedent, imposed only a monetary penalty rather than imprisonment. Sentence: The defendant was ordered to pay a fine of ₹500 per violation; in default of payment, 10 days simple imprisonment was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 33/2026 The Labour Court of Bharuch convicted Firoz Abdul Patel, owner of Kabir Petroleum, for violating Section 27(4) of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The defendant voluntarily confessed to the charges, and the court, considering the nature of the offense, the defendant's socio-economic status, and prior precedent, imposed only a monetary penalty rather than imprisonment. Sentence: The defendant was ordered to pay a fine of ₹500 per violation; in default of payment, 10 days simple imprisonment was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case