Chandubhai Virsangbhai Patel vs Coromandel International Limited Advocate - PIYUSHBHAI DANAK — 60/2015
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 010. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100000632015
Filing Number
60/2015
Filing Date
27-May-2015
Registration No
60/2015
Registration Date
27-May-2015
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandubhai Virsangbhai Patel
Adv. K D PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Coromandel International Limited Advocate - PIYUSHBHAI DANAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 60/2015 – Labour Court, Bharuch The Labour Court partially allowed Chandubhai Virsangbhai Patel's (petitioner) industrial dispute against Coromandel International Limited, finding that while reinstatement with back wages was not warranted due to his completion of retirement age (58 years), the dismissal was disproportionately harsh given his 16 years of clean service record. The court awarded him severance compensation of ₹7,50,000 and costs of ₹2,000, concluding that the employer's inquiry findings contradicting documentary evidence and victimization on union activity grounds rendered the punishment excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Mar-2026
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Sep-2025
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Aug-2025
Restored
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Aug-2025
Applicants Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2017
Judegement
-
03-Aug-2017
Restored
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2017
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2017
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Aug-2017
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Aug-2017
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jul-2017
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jul-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jul-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Jun-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-May-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Apr-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Apr-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Apr-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2017
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2017
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2017
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2016
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Dec-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Oct-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Jun-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Apr-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2016
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2015
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Oct-2015
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Sep-2015
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Aug-2015
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jul-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2015
Summary of Case 60/2015 – Labour Court, Bharuch The Labour Court partially allowed Chandubhai Virsangbhai Patel's (petitioner) industrial dispute against Coromandel International Limited, finding that while reinstatement with back wages was not warranted due to his completion of retirement age (58 years), the dismissal was disproportionately harsh given his 16 years of clean service record. The court awarded him severance compensation of ₹7,50,000 and costs of ₹2,000, concluding that the employer's inquiry findings contradicting documentary evidence and victimization on union activity grounds rendered the punishment excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts