RASHTRIY MAJHDUR SANGH vs HINDUSTAN M. I. SWACO LTD Advocate - B K SONEJI — 15/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Status: For Arguement of Applicant. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
REFER D LC - Referance D
CNR: GJBH100000562023
Filing Number
15/2023
Filing Date
12-Jan-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
12-Jan-2023
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RASHTRIY MAJHDUR SANGH
Adv. M I SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.HINDUSTAN M. I. SWACO LTD Advocate - B K SONEJI
Case History
-
16-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-May-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Apr-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Apr-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Feb-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Feb-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2026
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Rashtriy Majhdur Sangh v. Hindustan M.I. Swaco Ltd (15/2023) The Labour Court dismissed the union's application for interim relief seeking to restrain the company from moving machinery and assets. The court found the workers lacked a prima facie case, as the company's closure of its Dahej plant was lawful under standing orders, and wage recovery could be pursued through the company's operational Panoli unit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2026
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jan-2026
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jan-2026
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Other evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Aug-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jul-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jul-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jun-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Jun-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-May-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-May-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
30-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
19-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Jan-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Nov-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Oct-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Sep-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Aug-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jul-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Jun-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jun-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-May-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-May-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Apr-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jan-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jan-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Dec-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Nov-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Oct-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Aug-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jul-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jul-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jun-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-May-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Apr-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Apr-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2023
Case Summary: Rashtriy Majhdur Sangh v. Hindustan M.I. Swaco Ltd (15/2023) The Labour Court dismissed the union's application for interim relief seeking to restrain the company from moving machinery and assets. The court found the workers lacked a prima facie case, as the company's closure of its Dahej plant was lawful under standing orders, and wage recovery could be pursued through the company's operational Panoli unit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts