MAHIDA HINABEN KANAKSINH vs R.K.BHAKT Advocate - M I SHAIKH — 7/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10,1. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 04th May 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJBH100000242022
Filing Number
7/2022
Filing Date
20-Jan-2022
Registration No
7/2022
Registration Date
20-Jan-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, BHARUCH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHIDA HINABEN KANAKSINH
Adv. M D RANA, K D PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.K.BHAKT Advocate - M I SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 7/2022 Petitioner: Mahida Hinaben Kanaksinh Respondent: R.K. Bhakt (Advocate) and M.I. Shaikh Court: Labour Court No-1, Bharuch The Labour Court disposed of the reference under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 10(1) concerning whether the petitioner should be reinstated in employment with back wages from the date of dismissal. The court admitted the reference based on an order dated December 31, 2021, and after examining documentary evidence and hearing both parties, found the dismissal to be invalid. The court ordered reinstatement of the petitioner with conditional relief regarding back wages, subject to filing appropriate certified documents before the Primary Education Tribunal in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Apr-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Jan-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Dec-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Nov-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Nov-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Oct-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Sep-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Aug-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Jul-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Jul-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-May-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-May-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Apr-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Mar-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Feb-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jan-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jan-2024
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Dec-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Nov-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Nov-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Oct-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Oct-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Aug-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Aug-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jul-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jul-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jun-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-May-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-May-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-May-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Feb-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jan-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jan-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Dec-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Nov-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Sep-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Aug-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jul-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Apr-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Mar-2022
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Mar-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2022
Case Summary: 7/2022 Petitioner: Mahida Hinaben Kanaksinh Respondent: R.K. Bhakt (Advocate) and M.I. Shaikh Court: Labour Court No-1, Bharuch The Labour Court disposed of the reference under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 10(1) concerning whether the petitioner should be reinstated in employment with back wages from the date of dismissal. The court admitted the reference based on an order dated December 31, 2021, and after examining documentary evidence and hearing both parties, found the dismissal to be invalid. The court ordered reinstatement of the petitioner with conditional relief regarding back wages, subject to filing appropriate certified documents before the Primary Education Tribunal in Ahmedabad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts