THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SATISHBHAI SOMABHAI UKKADBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA — 1023/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090012422024

Filing Number

1023/2024

Filing Date

01-Aug-2024

Registration No

1023/2024

Registration Date

01-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050230491

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISHBHAI SOMABHAI UKKADBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 1023/2024 The State of Gujarat v. Satishbhai Somabhai Ukkadbhai Vasava The court acquitted the accused charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five panchas (witnesses) who were present during the seizure did not corroborate the prosecution's version, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that mere police testimony without reliable corroborating evidence cannot sustain a conviction, and applied the fundamental principle that suspicion—however strong—cannot replace proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 15-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 03-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 27-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 22-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 18-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 20-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 28-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 01-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 01-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1023/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1023/2024 The State of Gujarat v. Satishbhai Somabhai Ukkadbhai Vasava The court acquitted the accused charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the five panchas (witnesses) who were present during the seizure did not corroborate the prosecution's version, and no independent witnesses supported the case. The court held that mere police testimony without reliable corroborating evidence cannot sustain a conviction, and applied the fundamental principle that suspicion—however strong—cannot replace proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case