RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL vs KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN — 72/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH090011022025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
72/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
72/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL
Adv. C N JADAV
RANJITSINH RAMJIBHAI JIRAWALA
Adv. C N JADAV
LALITABEN DHIRAJBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
BAKULBHAI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
FALGUNI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
HARISHBHAI UMEDBHAI HANSOTI
Adv. C N JADAV
DHARMISTHABEN MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
CHETANKUMAR MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
Respondent(s)
KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN
JAYANTIBHAI BACHUBHAI VADDORIYA
Adv. G M SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 18-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 17-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 03-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 30-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 72/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioners' applications (Respondent 1's Sections 15 and 16 applications) with no order as to costs. Key Issue: This was a property dispute involving jointly-held agricultural land. Respondent 1 (Kashiben Devjibhai Parmar) sold her share of the co-owned property to Respondent 2 (Jayantibhai Bachubhai Vaddoriya) through a registered sale deed dated 10/01/2023. The petitioners challenged whether this sale violated their rights as co-owners and whether proper partition procedures under the Partition of Agricultural Lands Act, 1947 were followed. The court found the sale valid and the respondent's contentions regarding co-ownership rights were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 72/2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the petitioners' applications (Respondent 1's Sections 15 and 16 applications) with no order as to costs. Key Issue: This was a property dispute involving jointly-held agricultural land. Respondent 1 (Kashiben Devjibhai Parmar) sold her share of the co-owned property to Respondent 2 (Jayantibhai Bachubhai Vaddoriya) through a registered sale deed dated 10/01/2023. The petitioners challenged whether this sale violated their rights as co-owners and whether proper partition procedures under the Partition of Agricultural Lands Act, 1947 were followed. The court found the sale valid and the respondent's contentions regarding co-ownership rights were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts