RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL vs KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN — 71/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH090011012025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
71/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL
Adv. C N JADAV
RANJITSINH RAMJIBHAI JIRAWALA
Adv. C N JADAV
LALITABEN DHIRAJBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
BAKULBHAI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
FALGUNI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
HARISHBHAI UMEDBHAI HANSOTI
Adv. C N JADAV
DHARMISTHABEN MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
CHETANKUMAR MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
Respondent(s)
KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN
JAYANTIBHAI BACHUBHAI VADDORIYA
Adv. G M SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 18-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 17-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 03-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 30-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 71/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's applications (Amendments 15 and 16) are allowed/granted. No costs awarded. Key Issue: A property dispute involving joint ownership and alleged unauthorized sale deed. The petitioners challenged respondent 1's actions in transferring jointly-owned agricultural land to respondent 2 without proper authorization from all co-owners, violating principles of partition and succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 71/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's applications (Amendments 15 and 16) are allowed/granted. No costs awarded. Key Issue: A property dispute involving joint ownership and alleged unauthorized sale deed. The petitioners challenged respondent 1's actions in transferring jointly-owned agricultural land to respondent 2 without proper authorization from all co-owners, violating principles of partition and succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts