RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL vs KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN — 71/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Status: Hearing On Injunction Application. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Hearing On Injunction Application Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH090011012025

Filing Number

71/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

71/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL

    Adv. C N JADAV

  2. 2.RANJITSINH RAMJIBHAI JIRAWALA

    Adv. C N JADAV

  3. 3.LALITABEN DHIRAJBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. C N JADAV

  4. 4.BAKULBHAI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL

    Adv. C N JADAV

  5. 5.FALGUNI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL

    Adv. C N JADAV

  6. 6.HARISHBHAI UMEDBHAI HANSOTI

    Adv. C N JADAV

  7. 7.DHARMISTHABEN MANJIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. C N JADAV

  8. 8.CHETANKUMAR MANJIBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. C N JADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN

  2. 2.JAYANTIBHAI BACHUBHAI VADDORIYA

    Adv. G M SHAH

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 71/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's applications (Amendments 15 and 16) are allowed/granted. No costs awarded. Key Issue: A property dispute involving joint ownership and alleged unauthorized sale deed. The petitioners challenged respondent 1's actions in transferring jointly-owned agricultural land to respondent 2 without proper authorization from all co-owners, violating principles of partition and succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 20-Feb-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-Nov-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 71/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's applications (Amendments 15 and 16) are allowed/granted. No costs awarded. Key Issue: A property dispute involving joint ownership and alleged unauthorized sale deed. The petitioners challenged respondent 1's actions in transferring jointly-owned agricultural land to respondent 2 without proper authorization from all co-owners, violating principles of partition and succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case