RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL vs KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN — 69/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH090010992025

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

69/2025

Filing Date

03-09-2025

Registration No

69/2025

Registration Date

03-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 31,34,38

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL

Adv. C N JADAV

RANJITSINH RAMJIBHAI JIRAWALA

Adv. C N JADAV

LALITABEN DHIRAJBHAI PARMAR

Adv. C N JADAV

BAKULBHAI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL

Adv. C N JADAV

FALGUNI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL

Adv. C N JADAV

HARISHBHAI UMEDBHAI HANSOTI

Adv. C N JADAV

DHARMISTHABEN MANJIBHAI PARMAR

Adv. C N JADAV

CHETANKUMAR MANJIBHAI PARMAR

Adv. C N JADAV

Respondent(s)

KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN

JAYANTIBHAI BACHUBHAI VADDORIYA

Adv. G M SHAH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-05-2026

HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION

18-04-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

17-04-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

03-04-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

30-03-2026

WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY

Interim Orders

30-03-2026
ORDER
30-03-2026
ORDER
30-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 69/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's pleas in amendments 15 and 16 are dismissed; no costs awarded. Key Issue: This case involves a dispute over joint ancestral agricultural property among co-heirs. Petitioners challenged the sale deed executed by Respondent 1 (through Respondent 2) on grounds that it violated the Fragmentation of Agricultural Land Act, 1947, and that the sale deed was illegal and void as it was made without proper partition of the joint property and without consent of all co-owners. The court found the sale deed was executed illegally and the transfer violated land consolidation laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 69/2025 Outcome: Respondent 1's pleas in amendments 15 and 16 are dismissed; no costs awarded. Key Issue: This case involves a dispute over joint ancestral agricultural property among co-heirs. Petitioners challenged the sale deed executed by Respondent 1 (through Respondent 2) on grounds that it violated the Fragmentation of Agricultural Land Act, 1947, and that the sale deed was illegal and void as it was made without proper partition of the joint property and without consent of all co-owners. The court found the sale deed was executed illegally and the transfer violated land consolidation laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case