RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL vs KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN — 66/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,38. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH090010952025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRASINH RAMJIBHAI GOHIL
Adv. C N JADAV
RANJITSINH RAMJIBHAI JIRAWALA
Adv. C N JADAV
LALITABEN DHIRAJBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
BAKULBHAI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
FALGUNI DHIRAJBHAI AGRAWAL
Adv. C N JADAV
HARISHBHAI UMEDBHAI HANSOTI
Adv. C N JADAV
DHARMISTHABEN MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
CHETANKUMAR MANJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C N JADAV
Respondent(s)
KASHIBEN DEVJIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A F CHAUHAN
JAYANTIBHAI BACHUBHAI VADDORIYA
Adv. G M SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 18-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 17-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 03-04-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 30-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 66/2025 Case: Civil Suit No. 66/2025 Petitioners: Rajendrasinh Ramjibhai Gohil, Ranjitsinh Ramjibhai Jirawala, and Lalitaben Dhirajbhai Parmar Respondents: Kashiben Devjibhai Parmar (Advocate A.F. Chauhan and Jayantibhai Bachubhai Vaddoriya) Outcome: The court allowed petitioners' appeals (Sections 15 and 16) against respondent Number 1's decisions. The court found that respondent Number 1 improperly registered agricultural land (involving partition and sale deed) without proper authority and in violation of applicable land partition laws. The court determined that respondent Number 1's sale deed creating separate partition shares violated the Fragmentation of Land Holdings Act and was legally defective. No costs awarded. Order Date: March 30, 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 66/2025 Case: Civil Suit No. 66/2025 Petitioners: Rajendrasinh Ramjibhai Gohil, Ranjitsinh Ramjibhai Jirawala, and Lalitaben Dhirajbhai Parmar Respondents: Kashiben Devjibhai Parmar (Advocate A.F. Chauhan and Jayantibhai Bachubhai Vaddoriya) Outcome: The court allowed petitioners' appeals (Sections 15 and 16) against respondent Number 1's decisions. The court found that respondent Number 1 improperly registered agricultural land (involving partition and sale deed) without proper authority and in violation of applicable land partition laws. The court determined that respondent Number 1's sale deed creating separate partition shares violated the Fragmentation of Land Holdings Act and was legally defective. No costs awarded. Order Date: March 30, 2026 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts