THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHANDUBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA — 217/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002632026

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260064

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDUBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 217/2026 The court convicted respondent Chandubhai Jesingbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (probation offense) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three days with a fine of ₹200, or simple imprisonment if fine payment defaults. The court found that the respondent's own statement to police acknowledged guilt, and relying on precedent principles established in the Hirachand Dhirajchand case, the court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 217/2026 The court convicted respondent Chandubhai Jesingbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (probation offense) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three days with a fine of ₹200, or simple imprisonment if fine payment defaults. The court found that the respondent's own statement to police acknowledged guilt, and relying on precedent principles established in the Hirachand Dhirajchand case, the court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case