THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHANDUBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA — 217/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002632026

Case disposed

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260064

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

CHANDUBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PLEA

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 217/2026 The court convicted respondent Chandubhai Jesingbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (probation offense) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three days with a fine of ₹200, or simple imprisonment if fine payment defaults. The court found that the respondent's own statement to police acknowledged guilt, and relying on precedent principles established in the Hirachand Dhirajchand case, the court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 217/2026 The court convicted respondent Chandubhai Jesingbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 (probation offense) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three days with a fine of ₹200, or simple imprisonment if fine payment defaults. The court found that the respondent's own statement to police acknowledged guilt, and relying on precedent principles established in the Hirachand Dhirajchand case, the court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case