THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GANIBEN FATESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI — 216/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002622026

Filing Number

216/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

216/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260041

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANIBEN FATESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Ganiben Fatesingbhai Vasava under Section 65(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or three days simple imprisonment in default), with credit given for three days of custody. The court found that the accused's own voluntary confession, combined with police investigation records, established the charge, and applied principles established in precedent cases to uphold the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Ganiben Fatesingbhai Vasava under Section 65(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (or three days simple imprisonment in default), with credit given for three days of custody. The court found that the accused's own voluntary confession, combined with police investigation records, established the charge, and applied principles established in precedent cases to uphold the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case