THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI VINUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - V R NAROLIA — 203/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002482026

Filing Number

203/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050251149

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI VINUBHAI VASAVA Advocate - V R NAROLIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 203/2026 The Gujarat District Court convicted Rajeshbhai Vinubhai Vasava under IPC Section 275 (adulteration) and Section 54(1)(b) (violation of food safety standards). The accused pleaded guilty after police produced evidence of adulterated food items seized during inspection. The court accepted the voluntary confession and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,100 (₹1,000 under Section 275 and ₹100 under Section 54(1)(b)), with two days' simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 203/2026 The Gujarat District Court convicted Rajeshbhai Vinubhai Vasava under IPC Section 275 (adulteration) and Section 54(1)(b) (violation of food safety standards). The accused pleaded guilty after police produced evidence of adulterated food items seized during inspection. The court accepted the voluntary confession and sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,100 (₹1,000 under Section 275 and ₹100 under Section 54(1)(b)), with two days' simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case