THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAYALIBEN BIPINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI — 198/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002432026

Filing Number

198/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

198/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260049

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYALIBEN BIPINBHAI VASAVA Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Dayaliben Bipinbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for obstructing police investigation, sentencing her to simple imprisonment for three days and a fine of Rs. 200. The court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession regarding her culpable conduct and applied sentencing principles established in precedent, finding that imprisonment was justified given the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 198/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Dayaliben Bipinbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code 2023 for obstructing police investigation, sentencing her to simple imprisonment for three days and a fine of Rs. 200. The court accepted the respondent's voluntary confession regarding her culpable conduct and applied sentencing principles established in precedent, finding that imprisonment was justified given the circumstances of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case