THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HASMUKHBHAI FULJIBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - G F VASAVA — 197/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002422026

Filing Number

197/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

197/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260034

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASMUKHBHAI FULJIBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - G F VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused, Hasmukhbhai Fuljibhai Chaudhari, under Section 5(p)(a)(g) of the Prevention of Prohibition Act, sentencing him to imprisonment of three days (simple imprisonment) and a fine of Rs. 200, with the option of additional imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court found that the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime after police investigation, and applied established legal principles from prior precedent in reaching its decision to impose this sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Hasmukhbhai Fuljibhai Chaudhari, under Section 5(p)(a)(g) of the Prevention of Prohibition Act, sentencing him to imprisonment of three days (simple imprisonment) and a fine of Rs. 200, with the option of additional imprisonment if the fine is not paid. The court found that the accused voluntarily confessed to the crime after police investigation, and applied established legal principles from prior precedent in reaching its decision to impose this sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case