THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUNNIBEN DINESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA — 196/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH090002412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

196/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199050260027

Police Station

VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MUNNIBEN DINESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - K B VASAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PLEA

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Munniben Dineshbhai Vasava (196/2026) The court convicted respondent Munniben Dineshbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code (2023) and sentenced her to a fine of ₹200 with simple imprisonment for 3 days as an alternative. The court found that the respondent's police statement, made voluntarily and confessionally in nature, constituted sufficient evidence, and accepting the petitioner's submissions, the court imposed the punishment considering established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Munniben Dineshbhai Vasava (196/2026) The court convicted respondent Munniben Dineshbhai Vasava under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code (2023) and sentenced her to a fine of ₹200 with simple imprisonment for 3 days as an alternative. The court found that the respondent's police statement, made voluntarily and confessionally in nature, constituted sufficient evidence, and accepting the petitioner's submissions, the court imposed the punishment considering established legal principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case