THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JITUBHAI KHENIYABHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI — 195/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH090002402026
Filing Number
195/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
195/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VALIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199050260019
Police Station
VALIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITUBHAI KHENIYABHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - A K CHAUDHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused, Jitubhai Kheniyabhai Chaudhari, under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 and sentenced him to three days simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200. The court found that the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt during police interrogation, acknowledging that his family would face hardship if he were imprisoned, demonstrating consciousness of guilt. Applying established legal principles, the court deemed the lighter sentence of imprisonment appropriate in the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 195/2026
The court convicted the accused, Jitubhai Kheniyabhai Chaudhari, under Section 271(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 2023 and sentenced him to three days simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200. The court found that the accused had voluntarily admitted guilt during police interrogation, acknowledging that his family would face hardship if he were imprisoned, demonstrating consciousness of guilt. Applying established legal principles, the court deemed the lighter sentence of imprisonment appropriate in the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts