GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KAIVALJITSINH JAYENDRASIN RATHOD Advocate - B R SHAH — 4313/2022
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 19th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH080045852022
Filing Number
4313/2022
Filing Date
17-Nov-2022
Registration No
4313/2022
Registration Date
17-Nov-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199028210373
Police Station
JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAIVALJITSINH JAYENDRASIN RATHOD Advocate - B R SHAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Kaivaljitsinh Jayendrasin Rathod (4313/2022) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65 (possessing foreign liquor without permit), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence: no independent witnesses corroborated the seizure, the seized liquor lacked proper FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing reports, and insufficient proof that the contraband was recovered from the respondent's direct possession or premises under his ownership/control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2025
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Feb-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 4313/2022
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Kaivaljitsinh Jayendrasin Rathod (4313/2022) The court acquitted the respondent of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65 (possessing foreign liquor without permit), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence: no independent witnesses corroborated the seizure, the seized liquor lacked proper FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) testing reports, and insufficient proof that the contraband was recovered from the respondent's direct possession or premises under his ownership/control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts