GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs VIPULBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G J THAKAR — 4049/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080045342023

Filing Number

4049/2023

Filing Date

17-Oct-2023

Registration No

4049/2023

Registration Date

17-Oct-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199009230245

Police Station

UMALLA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIPULBHAI JESINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G J THAKAR

  2. 2.JESINGBHAI MELSINGBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. G J THAKAR

  3. 3.VIPULBHAI KALIDASBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. G J THAKAR

  4. 4.KALIDASBHAI SHANTILALBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. G J THAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC NO 4049/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Vipulbhai Jesingbhai Vasava, Jesingbhai Melsingbhai Vasava, Vipulbhai Kalidasbhai Vasava, and Kalidasbhai Shantilal Vasava) of charges under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), 504 (insult), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps and contradictions in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the FIR and investigation. While the victim sustained injuries, the evidence regarding who inflicted them lacked clarity—the victim's own statement was inconsistent about which accused caused specific injuries. Medical and police records failed to conclusively connect the accused to the alleged crimes. The court determined that without clear, corroborating evidence of intentional harm and malicious threats, acquittal was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 21-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 31-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 06-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 20-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 29-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 20-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 17-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4049/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC NO 4049/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Vipulbhai Jesingbhai Vasava, Jesingbhai Melsingbhai Vasava, Vipulbhai Kalidasbhai Vasava, and Kalidasbhai Shantilal Vasava) of charges under IPC Section 323 (causing hurt), 504 (insult), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation). The prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements of guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to significant evidentiary gaps and contradictions in witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court found critical deficiencies in the FIR and investigation. While the victim sustained injuries, the evidence regarding who inflicted them lacked clarity—the victim's own statement was inconsistent about which accused caused specific injuries. Medical and police records failed to conclusively connect the accused to the alleged crimes. The court determined that without clear, corroborating evidence of intentional harm and malicious threats, acquittal was warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case