GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAKESHBHAI MANGUBHAI MACHHAR Advocate - A K CHAUHAN — 3870/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH080042972023
Filing Number
3870/2023
Filing Date
04-Oct-2023
Registration No
3870/2023
Registration Date
04-Oct-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199057230326
Police Station
RAJPARDI POLICE STATION JHAGADIA - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAKESHBHAI MANGUBHAI MACHHAR Advocate - A K CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3870/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 255 and other criminal provisions due to lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the criminal case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses' statements contained contradictions and the investigation was procedurally deficient. Additionally, the court determined that the accused's conviction could not be sustained on the basis of circumstantial evidence alone without corroborating proof. Key Points: - Accused acquitted of charges under IPC 248, 337, 338 and MV Act 184 - Compensation of Rs. 5,000 awarded to accused under CrPC 437(a) for wrongful prosecution This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3870/2023
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3870/2023 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 255 and other criminal provisions due to lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the criminal case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses' statements contained contradictions and the investigation was procedurally deficient. Additionally, the court determined that the accused's conviction could not be sustained on the basis of circumstantial evidence alone without corroborating proof. Key Points: - Accused acquitted of charges under IPC 248, 337, 338 and MV Act 184 - Compensation of Rs. 5,000 awarded to accused under CrPC 437(a) for wrongful prosecution This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts