STET BANK OF INDIA, vs ROSHANBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA — 8/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBH080038772025
Filing Number
8/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
03-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 09-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STET BANK OF INDIA,
Adv. A H PANDYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROSHANBHAI RATILALBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 8/2025 The court dismissed STET Bank of India's suit against Roshanbhai Ratilalbhai Vasava after finding that the defendant had settled the dispute by repaying the outstanding loan amount, thereby rendering the case moot. The court ordered dismissal of the suit with costs to be recovered from the defendant and directed refund of court fees as per procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2025
Summary of Case 8/2025 The court dismissed STET Bank of India's suit against Roshanbhai Ratilalbhai Vasava after finding that the defendant had settled the dispute by repaying the outstanding loan amount, thereby rendering the case moot. The court ordered dismissal of the suit with costs to be recovered from the defendant and directed refund of court fees as per procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts