GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs NILESHBHAI RAJESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P P PATEL — 3423/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),117(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBH080037282025

Filing Number

3423/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

3423/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11199059250348

Police Station

JHAGADIYA GIDC POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),117(2)
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NILESHBHAI RAJESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - P P PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 3423/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Civil Judge of Jhagadia acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of criminal intimidation and causing hurt. The court found that the prosecution failed to substantiate its allegations against the respondent through credible evidence, and no special mention was recorded under CrPC Section 351 to warrant conviction. Key Reasoning: The court held that in criminal proceedings, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented—both oral and documentary—did not credibly establish that the respondent committed the alleged offenses of assault and intimidation against the petitioner's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3423/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3423/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Civil Judge of Jhagadia acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and J.P. Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of criminal intimidation and causing hurt. The court found that the prosecution failed to substantiate its allegations against the respondent through credible evidence, and no special mention was recorded under CrPC Section 351 to warrant conviction. Key Reasoning: The court held that in criminal proceedings, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented—both oral and documentary—did not credibly establish that the respondent committed the alleged offenses of assault and intimidation against the petitioner's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case