GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KUNDANBHAI SANMUKHBHAI THAKOR Advocate - M F MANSURI — 2844/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,143,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH080032252024
Filing Number
2844/2024
Filing Date
16-Jul-2024
Registration No
2844/2024
Registration Date
16-Jul-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199028240192
Police Station
JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KUNDANBHAI SANMUKHBHAI THAKOR Advocate - M F MANSURI
-
2.AJAYBHAI SANMUKHBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
3.HARESH @ JHINO KANUBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
4.VISHNUBHAI DINESHBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
5.GIRISHBHAI @ GIRO DHANSUKHBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
6.BHARATBHAI @ CHACHU DILIPBHAI KAMBOIYA
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
7.MITESHBHAI @ MIT JAGDISHBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
-
8.DIPAK @ DIPO MANHARBHAI THAKOR
Adv. M F MANSURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CCNO 2844/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all accused persons (Kundanbhai, Ajaybhai, and Haresh Thakor) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 143, 147, 148, 149, and 135, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were ordered released immediately, with each entitled to Rs. 5,000 bail refund under CrPC Section 437(a). Key Reasoning: The court found that the investigating officer's evidence lacked corroboration; no medical evidence definitively proved the specific injuries alleged, and the prosecution's eyewitness testimony proved insufficient to sustain the charges of criminal assault and unlawful assembly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2844/2024
Case Summary: CCNO 2844/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all accused persons (Kundanbhai, Ajaybhai, and Haresh Thakor) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 143, 147, 148, 149, and 135, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were ordered released immediately, with each entitled to Rs. 5,000 bail refund under CrPC Section 437(a). Key Reasoning: The court found that the investigating officer's evidence lacked corroboration; no medical evidence definitively proved the specific injuries alleged, and the prosecution's eyewitness testimony proved insufficient to sustain the charges of criminal assault and unlawful assembly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts