GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HASMUKHBHAI @BABAR MANHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M L VASAVA — 2349/2023
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(E). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBH080025682023
Filing Number
2349/2023
Filing Date
18-May-2023
Registration No
2349/2023
Registration Date
18-May-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11199028220952
Police Station
JHAGADIA POLICE STATION - BHARUCH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HASMUKHBHAI @BABAR MANHARBHAI VASAVA Advocate - M L VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Hasmukhbhai Vasava (2349/2023) The court acquitted the accused Hasmukhbhai Vasava of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(e), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the foreign liquor was in the accused's possession. The court noted critical evidentive gaps: the prosecution relied on police witnesses with vested interests, failed to collect independent witness statements from the seizure location despite opportunity, and did not submit the required FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the contraband, creating reasonable doubt about the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jun-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2349/2023
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Hasmukhbhai Vasava (2349/2023) The court acquitted the accused Hasmukhbhai Vasava of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(e), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the foreign liquor was in the accused's possession. The court noted critical evidentive gaps: the prosecution relied on police witnesses with vested interests, failed to collect independent witness statements from the seizure location despite opportunity, and did not submit the required FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report on the contraband, creating reasonable doubt about the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts