JASHUBEN D/O PARSOTTAMBHAI LALIYABHAI AND WIDOW OF VIRAMBHAI MADHUBHAI PARMAR vs HITESHBHAI NATVARBHAI SONVANI Advocate - D N KHER — 10/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 29th June 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBH080023502024

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

21-May-2024

Registration No

10/2024

Registration Date

21-May-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHAGADIA

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

29-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 09-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASHUBEN D/O PARSOTTAMBHAI LALIYABHAI AND WIDOW OF VIRAMBHAI MADHUBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. T P PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HITESHBHAI NATVARBHAI SONVANI Advocate - D N KHER

  2. 2.KAMLESHBHAI NATVARBHAI SONVANI

    Adv. D N KHER

  3. 3.RAJESHBHAI NATVARBHAI SONVANI

    Adv. D N KHER

  4. 4.DEVANGI BHAGVANBHAI SETA W/O BHAVDIV SURANI

    Adv. D N KHER

  5. 5.URO GLASS LIMITED

    Adv. H B SAVALIYA-G/299/

  6. 6.URO GLASS LIMITED ( TALAKASHIBHAI LAKHAMSHIBHAI NANDU )

    Adv. H B SAVALIYA

  7. 7.DIRECTOR OF URO GLASS LIMITED ( ORATIK K SHAH )

    Adv. H B SAVALIYA-G/299/

  8. 8.BANK OF INDIA

    Adv. A H PANDYA

  9. 9.E M V INFRA PROJECT LIMITED

  10. 10.DIRECTOR OF E M V INFRA PROJECT LIMITED (UMANG M MODI )

  11. 11.VALLABHBHAI DHANJIBHAI SHIHORA

    Adv. J M DOSHI

  12. 12.BABUBHAI @ BALUBHAI LAKHAMANBHAI KALSARIYA

    Adv. J M DOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 10/2024 Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a), (d) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found that the plaintiff created an illusory cause of action through clever drafting to artificially bring the suit within the limitation period, and that the suit was barred by limitation. The court noted the plaintiff remained silent for over 40 years about revenue mutation entries (1982) and land sales (2007-2014) before filing suit in 2024, and that she had signed a notarized consent deed in 2014 waiving her rights—facts she deliberately suppressed from her pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 18-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 28-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 27-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 18-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 16-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 26-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 21-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 21-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special Civil Suit No. 10/2024 Decision: The court rejected the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a), (d) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found that the plaintiff created an illusory cause of action through clever drafting to artificially bring the suit within the limitation period, and that the suit was barred by limitation. The court noted the plaintiff remained silent for over 40 years about revenue mutation entries (1982) and land sales (2007-2014) before filing suit in 2024, and that she had signed a notarized consent deed in 2014 waiving her rights—facts she deliberately suppressed from her pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case